Data product · reviewed quarterly

Hong Kong PPF Installation Observatory

This report aggregates anonymised installation records published by LETS GET WRAP where the vehicle, service scope and material fields are complete. It reflects our own installation sample — not the Hong Kong market as a whole, not every PPF brand, and not laboratory material testing. Every figure can be checked case by case in the archive linked below.

Facts last verified 2026-08-21 against the Published case archive (observatory dataset). Next review due 2026-11-21. Method and citation

Sample, method and limitations

Data period: Public case archive as published up to 2026-08-21
Sample: 486 of 496 published LETS GET WRAP case records
Inclusion criteria: Case is publicly published on letsgetwrap.com and states brand, model and material.
Exclusion criteria: 10 records excluded for missing brand, model or material fields.
Method: Counts are derived programmatically from the published case fields (material line, finish text, product list). A case can belong to more than one service or texture group, so those percentages can exceed 100%.
Author: LETS GET WRAP content team
Technical review: LETS GET WRAP lead installer (technical review)
Last updated: 2026-08-21
Next review: 2026-11-21
Version: v1.0

Limitations (please cite these together with the figures)

This is an in-house installation sample, not a Hong Kong market study, market-share estimate or average market price.
It is not a laboratory performance test of any film; durability claims are not inferred from this data.
Individual completion months are not published per case, so no time-series or trend conclusions are drawn.
The sample skews towards vehicles whose owners agreed to photography and publication.

Vehicle makes in sample (top 12)

Category	Cases	Share of sample
Tesla	133	27.4%
BMW	56	11.5%
Smart	45	9.3%
Porsche	27	5.6%
BYD	26	5.3%
MERCEDES-BENZ	25	5.1%
Zeekr	20	4.1%
Toyota	16	3.3%
Audi	10	2.1%
Mini	10	2.1%
Subaru	10	2.1%
Honda	9	1.9%

Service scope (multi-count)

Category	Cases	Share of sample
Window & light film	485	99.8%
Coating & detailing	482	99.2%
Colour PPF colour change	258	53.1%
Clear paint protection film	238	49%

Surface finish (multi-count)

Category	Cases	Share of sample
Satin / matte	143	29.4%
Gloss	104	21.4%
Chrome	75	15.4%
Liquid metallic	50	10.3%
Forged carbon	6	1.2%

Colour PPF colour families

Category	Cases	Share of sample
Black	48	9.9%
Blue	45	9.3%
Green	36	7.4%
Grey	32	6.6%
Purple	29	6%
Silver	23	4.7%
White	22	4.5%
Red	14	2.9%
Pink	11	2.3%
Orange	9	1.9%

Material lines observed

Category	Cases	Share of sample
GSWF	486	100%
KOCH-CHEMIE	482	99.2%
CYBRIX	201	41.4%
STEK	85	17.5%
iCaur	4	0.8%

Field disclosure rate

Category	Cases	Share of sample
Install window disclosed	0	0%
Budget tier disclosed	0	0%
Manufacturer-backed material noted	46	9.5%

Evidence card

Our conclusion: For owners comparing clear PPF against Colour PPF, we weigh material traceability, the vehicle's paint condition, how long the car will be kept and the written warranty terms — not colour or entry price alone.
Author & technical review: Author: LETS GET WRAP content team; technical review: LETS GET WRAP lead installer (technical review); updated 2026-08-21.
Studio observation: Based on 486 published, field-complete installation records out of 496 cases; definitions and limits are listed in the method block above.
Manufacturer-verifiable data: Material lines, specifications and warranty documents are held by the film manufacturers; we link to the official product pages and record the check date on each service page.
When this does not apply: Repainted or ageing paint must be assessed before installation; deep collision damage or cuts are outside self-healing behaviour, and this report is not a durability test.
Supporting evidence: Browse the full case archive See pricing and service scope